Seismic Design at Low Altitude, Building Built on the Playground
Abstract
The presence of walls on the dashboard changes the behavior of the building on a more general basis. However, it is common practice for companies to ignore the possibility of wall erosion for the details of the building being built. Engineers believe that analysis without looking at constraints is what improves design. But this may not always be true, especially for low-cost homeowners without using it. Therefore, the design of the walls in the integrated architectural design is crucial. ISI 1893: 2002 allows warehouse storage without regard to energy constraints, but with an increase of 2.5 versus consumption. According to the schedule, vacant flyer posts and markings should be designed up to 2.5 times the store's sales and schedules according to the non-slip layout (i.e. without driving force). However, as engineers know in design agencies, the size factor of 2.5 is not realistic for low-rise buildings. This requires revision and revision of the special rule that has proposed much of the rationale for low-income housing. Therefore, the aim of this study is defined as checking the use of factor 2.5 and investigating the effect of energy efficiency and stress on the post-diffusion model Home theater industry. A building built on RC (G + 3) with landfills located in the seismic zone - V is designed for this study. This building has been analyzed for two different issues: (a) consideration of body weight and weight and (b) consideration of material damage without consideration of strength. Two types of templates were used with SAP2000 software. Weight loss using mean weighted weight and similar devices evaluated from this death test was analyzed for durability analysis. Similar to eliminating pressure using a sequential method.
References
. A. Asokan, (2006) Modelling of Masonry Infill Walls for Nonlinear Static Analysis of Buildings under Seismic Loads. M. S. Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai.
. Agarwal P. and Shrikhande M. (2006) Earthquake resistant design of structures, PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
. Al-Chaar, G. (2002) Evaluating strength and stiffness of unreinforced masonry infill structures. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Technical Report NO. ERDC/CERL TR- 02-1. Construction Engineering Research Laboratory. Campaign. USA
. Al-Chaar, G., M. Issa and S. Sweeney (2002) Behaviour of masonry infilled non- ductile RC frames. Journal of Structural Engineering. American society of Civil Engineers. 128(8). 1055-1063
. Arlekar, J.N.; S. K. Jain and C.V.R Murty (1997) Seismic response of RC frame buildings with soft first storeys. Proceedings of CBRI golden jubilee conference on natural hazards in urban habitat. New Delhi
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2012 - 2023, All rights reserved.| ijitr.com
International Journal of Innovative Technology and Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.Based on a work at IJITR , Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en_GB.