Author Guidelines
Ethics for Editors
IJITR Editors must maintain their editorial independence and work to ensure that Authors have editorial freedom. Responsibility for acceptance or rejection of manuscripts rests with the Editors. Doing so normally entails advice from Reviewers; however, manuscripts that Editors deem clearly inappropriate may be rejected without such review.
Paper can be submit through our online process by registering yourself as an author .
1. Online submission is mandatory to review your paper.
2. The Publication charge is in conditional basis for details contact chief editor.
Basicaly the publication fee which includes paper processing,editing and other mantainance cost is given below.
Indian Author INR 3500
Other then India $ 90
for deatils rule follow the checklist below
Prepare your paper with IEEE paper format , to know the instruction you can read the instruction bellow.
Title page
The Title should be a brief phrase (capitalize first letter of each word in the title). The Title Page should include the authors' full names and affiliations, the name of the corresponding author along with E-mail information.
Abstract
The Abstract should be informative and completely self-explanatory, briefly present the topic, state the scope of the work/experiments, indicate significant data, and point out major findings and conclusions. The Abstract should be 100 to 300 words in length. Complete sentences, active verbs, and the third person should be used, and the abstract should be written in the past tense. Standard nomenclature should be used and abbreviations should be avoided. No literature should be cited.
Key words (2-6) should be provided below the Abstract to assist with indexing of the article.
A list of non-standard Abbreviations should be added. In general, non-standard abbreviations should be used only when the full term is very long.
Introduction
The Introduction should provide a clear statement of the problem, the relevant literature on the subject, and the proposed approach or solution. It should be understandable to colleagues from a broad range of scientific disciplines.
Materials and methods
This section should be brief but provide sufficient detail of the material used and equipment and the procedure followed to allow the work to be repeated by others.
The sources of the laboratory procedures (Chemicals, reagents, cultures, animals, plants and instruments) should be cited and any changes that were made must be noted. Information on the equipment model, manufacturers name and address including the city, province/state and country should be provided. The procedures should be written in the past tense.
Results
Results should be presented with clarity and precision. The results should be written in the past tense when describing findings in the authors' experiments. Previously published findings should be written in the present tense. Results should be explained, but largely without referring to the literature. Discussion, speculation and detailed interpretation of data should not be included in the Results but should be put into the Discussion section.
Discussion
The Discussion should interpret the findings in view of the results obtained in this and in past studies on this topic. State the conclusions in a few sentences at the end of the paper. The Results and Discussion sections can include subheadings, and when appropriate, both sections can be combined.
Conclusion
The main conclusions of the experimental work should be presented. The contribution of the work to the scientific community and its economic implications should be emphasized.
Journal papers
[1] Minar, J., Breev, K.A. 1983. Studies on the low and fundamental populations of the warble fly, Hypoderma bovis (Diptera, Hypodermatidae). Folia Parasitol, 30, pp. 57–71.
Text Book
[2] John, A.,1995. Study and Modeling of Digital Systems. 3rd Ed. McGras Hill, New York. ISBN: 12704646658, pp: 32.
Figure legends
Figure legends should be typed in numerical order on a separate sheet. Graphics should be prepared using applications capable of generating high resolution GIF, TIFF, JPEG or PowerPoint before pasting in the Microsoft Word manuscript file. Tables should be prepared in Microsoft Word. Use Arabic numerals to designate figures and upper case letters for their parts (Figure 1). Begin each legend with a title and include sufficient description so that the figure is understandable without reading the text of the manuscript. Information given in legends should not be repeated in the text.
Tables
Tables should be self-contained and the data should not be duplicated in figures. Tables should be numbered consecutively in Arabic numerals. Each table should be presented on a separate page with a comprehensive but concise legend above the table. Tables should be double-spaced. Column headings should be brief, with units of measurement in parentheses. All abbreviations should be defined in footnotes.
Copyright: Submission of a manuscript implies: that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, or thesis) that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peer review process
Step-1: Manuscript received from author
Step-2: The editor determines whether the article is suffiecient quality and appropriate content.
Step-3: He will either reject or accept it, if he accepts will assign the manuscript number in order, then forward to the suitable reviewer along with manuscript evaluation form and reviewer guidelines (which is a complete online assignment).
Step-4: The Reviewer should following
• Originality and Quality of the work
• Experimental design
• Appropriateness of the statistical analyses
• Appropriate literature citations
• Adequacy of experimental techniques
• Relevancy of conclusions and interpretation
• Significance of discussion
• Instructions to Authors
• Adequacy of title and abstract
• Correct figures/images and tables
• Plagiarism, Missing or incomplete attestation
Step-5: The article is returned to the editor along with an evaluation form.
Step-6: The article is returned to the author along with reviewer’s feedback, the author have to revise the article and resubmit it.
Step-7: The editor receives the revised article and take the final decision to publish or not, taking into consideration the reviewer’s feedback.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Following are some of the useful editing tools available in web, which the authors may make use of while submitting the articles.
- www.grammarly.com
- www.proofhub.com/mini
- www.paperrater.com
- www.afterthedeadline.com
- www.polishmywriting.com
- www.spellchecker.net/spellcheck
- www.paperrater.com
Plagiarism detection
Use full sites
-
Copyright Notice
To
The Editor-in-Chief, IJITR
1. I understand that the Editor-in-Chief may transfer the Copyright to a publisher at his discretion.
2. The author(s) reserve(s) all proprietary rights such as patent rights and the right to use all or part of the article in future works of their own such as lectures, press releases, and reviews of textbooks. In the case of republication of the whole, part, or parts thereof, in periodicals or reprint publications by a third party, written permission must be obtained from the The Editor-in-Chief IJITR, or his designated publisher.
3. I am authorized to execute this transfer of copyright on behalf of all the authors of the article named above.
4. I hereby declare that the material being presented by me in this paper is our original work, and does not contain or include material taken from other copyrighted sources. Wherever such material has been included, it has been clearly indented or/and identified by quotation marks and due and proper acknowledgements given by citing the source at appropriate places.
